LogSeq/logseq/.recycle/pages_Preventing financial fraud by using UE PEI ___ IMEI from 5G-EIR.md

• 
• Review
  • **Technical Innovation **
    • 1 - Routine work, untested technical work or impractical idea
    • 2 - Good work, not particularly novel, akin to a routine evolution of existing technologies
    • 3 - Good technical work with some novel features described
    • 4 - Very innovative technical work that demonstrates clear thought leadership for HPE
    • 5 - Clearly a breakthrough with significant technical innovation
  • Business Impact
    • 1 - Impractical idea; limited business value
    • 2 - Good work, but with limited direct or indirect business value, no clear path to capture business value+
    • 3 - Moderate business impact that merits further assessment
    • 4 - Work will provide HPE with valuable and meaningful differentiation in the market
    • 5 - Clearly and significant impacts HPE’s business, opens new market opportunities
  • Clarity of Presentation
    • 1 - Difficult to understand; confusing; incomplete description; very short
    • 2 - Hard to follow; uses unfamiliar terminology or acronyms; missing important data
    • 3 - Understandable but lacking some relevant information
    • 4 - Clear and logical; some important information is missing or unclear
    • 5 - Very clearly described; logical flow; well supported with practical results and proof points
  • Overall Recommendation
    • 1 - Reject
    • 2 - Weak Reject
    • 3 - Weak Accept
    • 4 - Accept
    • 5 - Strong Accept
  • Suggested Presentation Style What type of presentation do you recommend for this submission?
    • Formal Session
    • Poster Session
    • Not recommended for presentation
  • Favorite
    • No
    • Yes
  • Reviewer Confidence
    • 1 - No confidence - I am not qualified to pass judgement on this submission
    • 2 - Low confidence - I do not have enough experience in this area to make a definitive decision on this submission
    • 3 - Somewhat confident - I have a reasonable understanding of this research area
    • 4 - Confident - I have considerable confidence in my review and understanding of this work
    • 5 - Very Confident - I am confident in my review and understanding of the work
  • Comments for the Authors Provide constructive comments to the author(s).
    • This is a really interesting idea. The author(s) did a great job of outlining the problem statement and the proposed solution is clearly articulated. The idea of using the IMEI/PEI to reliably validate the device is well thought out and would significantly raise the attackers difficulty level (ie. spoofing an IMEI).
    • In the problem statement the author(s) call out 'technical literacy' as one of the contributing factors to these sorts of attacks - how would they author(s) propose to improve/simplify the usability or (de)registering devices, user education etc?
    • Overall, great work and an idea worth exploring further.
  • Comments for the Program Committee (authors will not see these comments) Provide comments to the PC (if any) that should not be shared with the author(s).
    • Well written and clearly defines both the problem and the solution.