first commit

pages/End to End VoIP stats.md

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+- ![438.pdf](../assets/438_1725987627705_0.pdf)
+- **Review**
+	- **Technical Innovation **
+	  * [ ] 1 - Routine work, untested technical work or impractical idea
+	  * [ ] 2 - Good work, not particularly novel, akin to a routine evolution of existing technologies
+	  * [x] 3 - Good technical work with some novel features described
+	  * [ ] 4 - Very innovative technical work that demonstrates clear thought leadership for HPE
+	  * [ ] 5 - Clearly a breakthrough with significant technical innovation
+	- **Business Impact**
+	  * [ ] 1 - Impractical idea; limited business value
+	  * [ ] 2 - Good work, but with limited direct or indirect business value, no clear path to capture business value+
+	  * [x] 3 - Moderate business impact that merits further assessment
+	  * [ ] 4 - Work will provide HPE with valuable and meaningful differentiation in the market
+	  * [ ] 5 - Clearly and significant impacts HPE’s business, opens new market opportunities
+	- **Clarity of Presentation**
+	  * [ ] 1 - Difficult to understand; confusing; incomplete description; very short
+	  * [ ] 2 - Hard to follow; uses unfamiliar terminology or acronyms; missing important data
+	  * [ ] 3 - Understandable but lacking some relevant information
+	  * [x] 4 - Clear and logical; some important information is missing or unclear
+	  * [ ] 5 - Very clearly described; logical flow; well supported with practical results and proof points
+	- **Overall Recommendation**
+	  * [ ] 1 - Reject
+	  * [ ] 2 - Weak Reject
+	  * [ ] 3 - Weak Accept
+	  * [x] 4 - Accept
+	  * [ ] 5 - Strong Accept
+	- **Suggested Presentation Style**
+	  *What type of presentation do you recommend for this submission?*  
+	  * [ ] Formal Session
+	  * [x] Poster Session
+	  * [ ] Not recommended for presentation
+	- **Favorite**
+	  * [x] No
+	  * [ ] Yes
+	- **Reviewer Confidence**
+	  * [ ] 1 - No confidence - I am not qualified to pass judgement on this submission
+	  * [ ] 2 - Low confidence - I do not have enough experience in this area to make a definitive decision on this submission
+	  * [ ] 3 - Somewhat confident - I have a reasonable understanding of this research area
+	  * [ ] 4 - Confident - I have considerable confidence in my review and understanding of this work
+	  * [x] 5 - Very Confident - I am confident in my review and understanding of the work
+	- **Comments for the Authors**
+	  *Provide constructive comments to the author(s).*
+		- The author(s) outline a simple but effective solution to the problem of being able to provide statistics on end-to-end RTP streams by modifying the header to include a synchronized timestamp. This solution while simple, seems to provide adequate data for further analysis, and doesn't appear to have any obvious issues (assuming a local NTP server providing reasonable sync resolution).
+	- **Comments for the Program Committee (authors will not see these comments)**
+	  *Provide comments to the PC (if any) that should not be shared with the author(s).*
+		- <PLACEHOLDER>