mirror of
https://github.com/sstent/FitTrack_GarminSync.git
synced 2026-01-25 16:41:41 +00:00
Create specification for CLI app with MFA support
- Define user stories for authentication, sync triggering, and status checking - Specify functional requirements for text-based API interactions - Define success criteria for authentication and sync operations - Create quality checklist for specification validation
This commit is contained in:
34
specs/006-cli-auth-sync-mfa/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
34
specs/006-cli-auth-sync-mfa/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Specification Quality Checklist: CLI App for API Interaction with MFA
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
||||||
|
**Created**: Thursday, December 18, 2025
|
||||||
|
**Feature**: [/home/sstent/Projects/FitTrack/GarminSync/specs/006-cli-auth-sync-mfa/spec.md](spec.md)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Content Quality
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) - Updated from "command-line interface" to "text-based interface"
|
||||||
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
||||||
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders - Removed language-specific details
|
||||||
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
||||||
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
||||||
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
||||||
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
||||||
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
||||||
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
||||||
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
||||||
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified - Added Assumptions section
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Feature Readiness
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
||||||
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
||||||
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
||||||
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- All items have been completed and validated.
|
||||||
112
specs/006-cli-auth-sync-mfa/spec.md
Normal file
112
specs/006-cli-auth-sync-mfa/spec.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Feature Specification: CLI App for API Interaction with MFA
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Feature Branch**: `006-cli-auth-sync-mfa`
|
||||||
|
**Created**: Thursday, December 18, 2025
|
||||||
|
**Status**: Draft
|
||||||
|
**Input**: User description: "create a simple python CLI app for interacting with our API to authenticate the user, trigger a sync, and see the sync status. Allow for the use of MFA on the acct."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<!--
|
||||||
|
IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
|
||||||
|
Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
|
||||||
|
you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
|
||||||
|
Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
|
||||||
|
- Developed independently
|
||||||
|
- Tested independently
|
||||||
|
- Deployed independently
|
||||||
|
- Demonstrated to users independently
|
||||||
|
-->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### User Story 1 - Text-Based Authentication with MFA (Priority: P1)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As a user, I want to authenticate with the API via a text-based interface, including support for MFA on my account, so that I can securely access the system and perform sync operations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why this priority**: Authentication is the foundational requirement for any subsequent operations. Without secure authentication, all other features are inaccessible. MFA support is critical for account security.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Independent Test**: Can be fully tested by running the authentication command with both standard credentials and MFA-enabled accounts, and verifying the system properly validates credentials and handles MFA flows.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Given** a valid username and password without MFA, **When** I run the auth command, **Then** I am successfully authenticated and receive a valid session/token
|
||||||
|
2. **Given** a valid username, password, and MFA code, **When** I run the auth command, **Then** I am successfully authenticated after providing the MFA code
|
||||||
|
3. **Given** an invalid username/password, **When** I run the auth command, **Then** authentication fails with an appropriate error message
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### User Story 2 - Trigger Sync Operations via Text Interface (Priority: P2)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As a user, I want to trigger a sync operation from a text-based interface, so that I can initiate data synchronization between my account and the system without using the web interface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why this priority**: This is the core functionality that provides value beyond simple authentication. It allows users to initiate the primary business function (syncing data) from a text-based interface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Independent Test**: Can be fully tested by authenticating and then running the sync trigger command, and verifying that the sync process is initiated in the backend system.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Given** I am authenticated with a valid session, **When** I run the sync trigger command, **Then** a sync operation is initiated and I receive confirmation of the job
|
||||||
|
2. **Given** I am not authenticated, **When** I run the sync trigger command, **Then** I receive an authentication error
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### User Story 3 - Check Sync Status via Text Interface (Priority: P3)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As a user, I want to check the status of my sync operations from a text-based interface, so that I can monitor the progress of my data synchronization without using the web interface.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Why this priority**: This provides visibility into operations that may take time to complete, helping users understand system state and troubleshoot potential issues.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Independent Test**: Can be fully tested by triggering a sync and then checking its status via the text interface, with various sync states being properly reported.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Given** I am authenticated and have an active sync operation, **When** I run the status check command, **Then** I see the current status and progress of the sync
|
||||||
|
2. **Given** I am authenticated but have no active sync operations, **When** I run the status check command, **Then** I see appropriate status information
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Edge Cases
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- What happens when MFA code expires while entering it?
|
||||||
|
- How does the system handle network interruptions during sync operations?
|
||||||
|
- What happens when the API is temporarily unavailable during authentication?
|
||||||
|
- How does the system handle concurrent sync requests from the same user?
|
||||||
|
- What occurs if a user attempts to check status for a sync job that no longer exists?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Functional Requirements
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **FR-001**: System MUST provide a text-based interface for API interactions
|
||||||
|
- **FR-002**: System MUST authenticate users with support for Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
|
||||||
|
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to trigger a data sync operation from the text-based interface
|
||||||
|
- **FR-004**: Users MUST be able to check the status of ongoing sync operations from the text-based interface
|
||||||
|
- **FR-005**: System MUST securely store authentication credentials and tokens locally
|
||||||
|
- **FR-006**: System MUST support both interactive and non-interactive (scriptable) authentication modes
|
||||||
|
- **FR-007**: System MUST provide clear feedback and error messages to users during all operations
|
||||||
|
- **FR-008**: System MUST handle authentication token expiration and refresh automatically
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Key Entities
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **User Session**: Represents an authenticated user session with associated tokens and permissions
|
||||||
|
- **Sync Job**: Represents an initiated sync operation with status, progress, and metadata
|
||||||
|
- **Authentication Token**: Secure credential used to access the API on behalf of the user
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Measurable Outcomes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **SC-001**: Users can authenticate via text-based interface with and without MFA in under 30 seconds
|
||||||
|
- **SC-002**: 95% of sync operations initiated via text-based interface complete successfully within expected timeframes
|
||||||
|
- **SC-003**: Users can check sync status and receive accurate information within 5 seconds of the command
|
||||||
|
- **SC-004**: 90% of users successfully complete authentication on first attempt when using the text-based interface
|
||||||
|
- **SC-005**: Text-based interface supports all authentication methods available in the main application including MFA
|
||||||
|
- **SC-006**: Users can trigger sync operations from text-based interface as reliably as from the web interface
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Assumptions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- The existing API already supports the necessary endpoints for authentication, sync triggering, and status checking
|
||||||
|
- The API authentication mechanism (including MFA) is consistent between the web interface and API endpoints
|
||||||
|
- Users have access to a terminal/command-line environment on their systems
|
||||||
|
- The text-based interface will run in common operating system command-line environments (Windows, macOS, Linux)
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user